Editing Organization
From Wiki.OSArch
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This page does not represent a consensus among members of OSArch. See the page history to see who has made edits. See the discussion threads on [[OSArch_Supporters]] for more. | This page does not represent a consensus among members of OSArch. See the page history to see who has made edits. See the discussion threads on [[OSArch_Supporters]] for more. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=Assumptions= | =Assumptions= | ||
− | This page | + | This page assumes some assumptions about the goals of OSArch. |
* We want to change the world in line with our goals as stated at [[Open-Source_Architecture_Community]] | * We want to change the world in line with our goals as stated at [[Open-Source_Architecture_Community]] | ||
* We want to be a sustainable force, socially and economically | * We want to be a sustainable force, socially and economically | ||
Line 15: | Line 11: | ||
* We want to organize into projects/circles in which members of OSArch focus on specific issues (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/4008/#Comment_4008 circles] and [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/4025/#Comment_4025 projects]) | * We want to organize into projects/circles in which members of OSArch focus on specific issues (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/4008/#Comment_4008 circles] and [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/4025/#Comment_4025 projects]) | ||
* We want to have some form of members representing different interests (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5027/#Comment_5027 aspects]) | * We want to have some form of members representing different interests (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5027/#Comment_5027 aspects]) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
=Why?= | =Why?= | ||
Line 25: | Line 19: | ||
Does every decisions need to go through a formal process? No. Decisions are made all the time at an individual level and in small groups. This is a form of delegated power based on trust. Any formal organization needs to have clearly defined limits. For example every supporter and member is free to chose their activity in the organization. Anyone can start a project or support a project as an individual. | Does every decisions need to go through a formal process? No. Decisions are made all the time at an individual level and in small groups. This is a form of delegated power based on trust. Any formal organization needs to have clearly defined limits. For example every supporter and member is free to chose their activity in the organization. Anyone can start a project or support a project as an individual. | ||
− | + | So what '''does''' need to go through a formal process? Something can only be done through a formal process: | |
− | So what | ||
* Opening bank accounts as OSArch | * Opening bank accounts as OSArch | ||
* Establishing a legal organization as OSArch | * Establishing a legal organization as OSArch | ||
− | Okay, technically anyone could do this | + | Okay, technically anyone could do this. But then anyone else could do it as well - and then we really have a mess on our hands and a fight for control and influence before we're really going. |
− | + | So what else could benefit from a formal process? Here are some suggestions: | |
− | So what else could benefit from a formal process? | ||
* Decisions on distribution of funds (see [LiberaPay] and DAO below) | * Decisions on distribution of funds (see [LiberaPay] and DAO below) | ||
* Decisions on accepting funds (see ) | * Decisions on accepting funds (see ) | ||
− | |||
* Decisions on representing OSArch (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5359 bS BEM Expert Panel], [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/468/autodesk-wants-to-kill-the-file Letter on behalf of OSArch]) | * Decisions on representing OSArch (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5359 bS BEM Expert Panel], [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/468/autodesk-wants-to-kill-the-file Letter on behalf of OSArch]) | ||
* Decisions on terms of membership (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5337#Comment_5337 comments by MaartenFrough]) | * Decisions on terms of membership (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5337#Comment_5337 comments by MaartenFrough]) | ||
* Decisions on digital infrastructure (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/498/osarch-digital-infrastructure osarch-digital-infrastructure] and [[OSArch_Digital_Infrastructure]]) | * Decisions on digital infrastructure (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/498/osarch-digital-infrastructure osarch-digital-infrastructure] and [[OSArch_Digital_Infrastructure]]) | ||
+ | * see also [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/5337/#Comment_5337 this post] from [https://community.osarch.org/profile/MaartenFrough MaartenFrough] | ||
+ | * see also [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/182/organizational-structure-and-governance-of-osarch this post] from [https://community.osarch.org/profile/baswein baswein] | ||
What about all the other important decisions that need to be made? Well, that's also something we need to find out. Here are some examples of issues that might need a structure: | What about all the other important decisions that need to be made? Well, that's also something we need to find out. Here are some examples of issues that might need a structure: | ||
Line 45: | Line 38: | ||
=Methods of organization= | =Methods of organization= | ||
− | + | ==Lumio (procedural)== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ==Lumio ( | ||
− | |||
(see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/2394/#Comment_2394 Suggestions by DADA_universe]) | (see [https://community.osarch.org/discussion/comment/2394/#Comment_2394 Suggestions by DADA_universe]) | ||
− | + | * https://www.loomio.org/ "With Loomio, people participate on the web, email or mobile, in their own time. Discussions stay on topic, and Loomio suits a variety of discussion formats and styles. When you’re ready to make a decision, get feedback, or move from talk to action, Loomio’s polling tools are at your fingertips." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vCL4I19o9U Lumio TEDx talk]. Loomio is a forum-like system where proposals can be started and managed and peoples reactions can be measured until there is a decision. | |
− | "With Loomio, people participate on the web, email or mobile, in their own time. Discussions stay on topic, and Loomio suits a variety of discussion formats and styles. When you’re ready to make a decision, get feedback, or move from talk to action, Loomio’s polling tools are at your fingertips." [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vCL4I19o9U Lumio TEDx talk]. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==Holacracy (conceptual)== | ==Holacracy (conceptual)== | ||
Line 64: | Line 49: | ||
"Collaborative e-democracy is a democratic conception that combines key features of direct democracy, representative democracy, and e-democracy [...]." | "Collaborative e-democracy is a democratic conception that combines key features of direct democracy, representative democracy, and e-democracy [...]." | ||
− | ==Open- | + | ==Open-sourve governance== |
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_governance | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_governance | ||
Line 77: | Line 62: | ||
=Organizations to learn from= | =Organizations to learn from= | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Loomio Co-op== | ==Loomio Co-op== | ||
Line 97: | Line 79: | ||
=Parent Organizations to get us started= | =Parent Organizations to get us started= | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Open Collective== | ==Open Collective== | ||
Line 109: | Line 84: | ||
==Software Conservancy== | ==Software Conservancy== | ||
− | The [https://sfconservancy.org/ | + | The [Software Freedom Conservancy https://sfconservancy.org/] says "Software Freedom Conservancy is a not-for-profit charity that helps promote, improve, develop, and defend Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects. Conservancy provides a non-profit home and infrastructure for FLOSS projects. This allows FLOSS developers to focus on what they do best — writing and improving FLOSS for the general public — while Conservancy takes care of the projects' needs that do not relate directly to software development and documentation." |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |