Editing Open-Source Architecture Community

From Wiki.OSArch

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{| class="wikitable
 
{| class="wikitable
 
|-
 
|-
| [[File:Logo OSArch 128p.png]]
+
| [[File:Heckert_gnu.transp.small.png|GNU Free Software|64px]]
 
| The [[Open-Source Architecture Community]] brings together like-minded users and developers who share a common goal: that the built environment can be designed, constructed, operated, and recycled with '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software free/libre software]''' and '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source open-source software]''' with increased '''transparency''', and a more '''ethical''' approach.
 
| The [[Open-Source Architecture Community]] brings together like-minded users and developers who share a common goal: that the built environment can be designed, constructed, operated, and recycled with '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software free/libre software]''' and '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source open-source software]''' with increased '''transparency''', and a more '''ethical''' approach.
| [[File:Osi_keyhole_300X300_90ppi_0.png|Open Source Initiative|64px]]
+
| [[File:Osi_keyhole_300X300_90ppi_0.png|Open Source Initiative|64px]]
| [[File:Heckert_gnu.transp.small.png|GNU Free Software|64px]]
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 13: Line 12:
 
The architecture, engineering, construction, and building operations industry has a large, systemic problem with its ability to collaborate digitally. The digital ecosystem largely consists of isolated digital silos, where each tool does not integrate well with other tools by design. Behind these tools are a small selection of monopoly software vendors with predatory business practices, forcing [https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-incompatibility.html proprietary incompatibility], [https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-obsolescence.html proprietary obsolescence], and [https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-subscriptions.html proprietary subscriptions] onto users. There is also a lack of training material and knowledge sharing around digital standards. These problems enforce a culture onto the industry that our ability to manipulate the data about our built environment relies on what vendors who provide off-the-shelf software allow us to do. Resources are wasted on building workarounds and an ecosystem on top of this proprietary foundation, instead of focusing on what matters: working together to make a better built environment.
 
The architecture, engineering, construction, and building operations industry has a large, systemic problem with its ability to collaborate digitally. The digital ecosystem largely consists of isolated digital silos, where each tool does not integrate well with other tools by design. Behind these tools are a small selection of monopoly software vendors with predatory business practices, forcing [https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-incompatibility.html proprietary incompatibility], [https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-obsolescence.html proprietary obsolescence], and [https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/proprietary-subscriptions.html proprietary subscriptions] onto users. There is also a lack of training material and knowledge sharing around digital standards. These problems enforce a culture onto the industry that our ability to manipulate the data about our built environment relies on what vendors who provide off-the-shelf software allow us to do. Resources are wasted on building workarounds and an ecosystem on top of this proprietary foundation, instead of focusing on what matters: working together to make a better built environment.
  
The OSArch community aims to solve this problem, by providing support for a community and ecosystem of software that respects the digital freedom of the industry and its users. This digital freedom allows collaboration to occur, and is increasingly important as the industry and next generation of digitally savvy professionals leave academia to join us in our journey to improve the built environment. In particular, we help support four types of digital freedom, which are known as the [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.en four essential freedoms]. When the OSArch community talks about free software, we are not referring to price (which is a common misconception), we are talking about software that provides these four freedoms, of which price is not a factor. The freedoms are:
+
The OSArch community aims to solve this problem, by providing support for a community and ecosystem of software that respects the digital freedom of the industry and its users. This digital freedom allows collaboration to occur, and is increasingly important as the industry and next generation of digitally savvy professionals leave academia to join us in our journey to improve the built environment. In particular, we help support four types of digital freedom:
  
 
# The freedom to use software as you wish for any purposes, whether it be educational, commercial, R&D, in any context with no time limit, no arbitrary vendor restrictions, or any other rules governing your usage.
 
# The freedom to use software as you wish for any purposes, whether it be educational, commercial, R&D, in any context with no time limit, no arbitrary vendor restrictions, or any other rules governing your usage.
Line 20: Line 19:
 
# The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others. By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes.
 
# The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others. By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes.
  
A precondition to provide these four freedoms is to ensure that we are able to do all the work we need to do in the AEC industry using open source software. Satisfying this precondition means the license of the software must be an [https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html FSF-approved license] or an [https://opensource.org/licenses/category OSI-approved license]. Access to, and the freedom to change this code empowers and puts the users (that's you!) in control over the data in the built environment, instead of vendors.
+
A precondition to provide these four freedoms is to ensure that we are able to do all the work we need to do in the AEC industry using open source software. Access to, and the freedom to change this code empowers and puts the users (that's you!) in control over the data in the built environment, instead of vendors.
  
 
== How OSArch supports the AEC industry ==
 
== How OSArch supports the AEC industry ==
Line 63: Line 62:
  
 
We support people making the best choices with the best information and tools that respect their rights and freedoms.
 
We support people making the best choices with the best information and tools that respect their rights and freedoms.
 
==Visual Identity==
 
 
Logos, font etc. are found in our [[OSArch style guide]]
 
 
=In the news=
 
* In [https://upfrontezine.substack.com/p/upfrontezine-1103-open-source-architecture upFront.eZine #1,103: Open Source Architecture] Ralph Grabowski spoke with one of OSArchs organizers, [[User:Duncan|Duncan Lithgow]]
 
* [https://www.dbei.org/event/bilt-academy-podcast/ The BILT Academy Podcast] has a series about Open Source in Architecture. [https://biltacademypodcast.buzzsprout.com/1104947/9552226-episode-seventeen-open-source-part-1 Open Source - part one], [https://biltacademypodcast.buzzsprout.com/1104947/9942738-episode-nineteen-open-source-part-2 Open Source - part two] with Jon Mirtschin.
 
* The [https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/futureperfect-talks/id1528970566 Futureperfect Talk Podcast] episode #7 "A Futureperfect Talk on open source software, [https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/7-open-source-design-tools-for-architecture/id1528970566?i=1000510259187 open source design tools for AEC] and more, and the cultures around them with John Manoochehri (BASE2), Dion Moult (BlenderBIM), Yorik van Havre (FreeCAD) and Bruno Postle (Homemaker) share experiences, perspectives and outlook on what's going on and what's next."
 

Please note that all contributions to Wiki.OSArch are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (see Wiki.OSArch:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)