Difference between revisions of "List of known invalid IFC practices"
From Wiki.OSArch
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
See also [[:Category:IFC invalid practices]] | See also [[:Category:IFC invalid practices]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Autodesk Revit == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {|class="wikitable" | ||
| + | ! Summary | ||
| + | ! Last Verified | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Using <code>Open IFC</code>, any objects using Tessellations are not supported. For example, if you export an IFC4 from ArchiCAD, unless you force it to use parametric solids, Revit will be unable to show the geometry in these IFCs. | ||
| + | | 2021-04-12 | ||
| + | |} | ||
== Bentley OpenBuildings Designer == | == Bentley OpenBuildings Designer == | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 11 April 2021
See also Category:IFC invalid practices
Autodesk Revit
| Summary | Last Verified |
|---|---|
Using Open IFC, any objects using Tessellations are not supported. For example, if you export an IFC4 from ArchiCAD, unless you force it to use parametric solids, Revit will be unable to show the geometry in these IFCs.
|
2021-04-12 |
Bentley OpenBuildings Designer
| Summary | Last Verified |
|---|---|
IfcSurfaceStyleShading is still exported without an a Transparency attribute, even if an IFC4 export is done. This is technically correct if you check in a pre-addendum version of IFC4, but is not useful to users or updated IFC4 parsers.
|
2019-05-23 |
